thing with corruption
When we observe China’s rapid progress in infrastructure, manufacturing, and technological innovation, it’s tempting to argue that its lack of true democracy means its people lack freedoms. However, when comparing China to large democracies like the United States and India, a common pattern emerges. Despite the desire in these democracies to advance infrastructure, manufacturing, and technology, industries often lobby governments to prioritize profits over public good. This highlights an inherent flaw in democracies: industries with significant capital can influence bureaucrats, leading to decisions that may not align with the public’s best interests. China addresses this issue by preventing industrialists from exerting influence through force or lobbying. But is this approach justified? Can we trust that the government acts solely for the people’s benefit? Singapore offers an alternative model. By prioritizing high-quality education and fostering an informed populace aware of current events, it comes closer to a direct democracy than most systems today. The key question remains: How can we eliminate industry’s incentives to corrupt governance and ensure that governance consistently serves the public’s best interests?